![]() ![]() ![]() Overall, the results suggest that attending to the health of one’s friends’ marriages may serve to support and enhance the durability of one’s own relationship, and that, from a policy perspective, divorce should be understood as a collective phenomenon that extends beyond those directly affected.Īccording to the National Center for Health Statistics ( Bramlett & Mosher, 2001), about 43% of marriages will end in divorce within the first 15 years of marriage, and, as of 2007, the annual incidence of divorce stands at 36 per 1,000 people (National Vital Statistics Reports, 2007). Interestingly, the presence of children does not influence the likelihood of divorce, but each child reduces the susceptibility to being influenced by peers who get divorced. Popular people are less likely to get divorced, divorcees have denser social networks, and they are much more likely to remarry other divorcees. ![]() Clusters of divorces extend to two degrees of separation in the network. The results suggest that divorce can spread between friends. To explore how social networks influence divorce and vice versa, we exploit a longitudinal data set from the long-running Framingham Heart Study. Divorce represents the dissolution of a social tie, but it is also possible that attitudes about divorce flow across social ties. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |